According to the Feb. 12 business section of the New York Times – concerning its leading Fourth-Estate rival, the Washington Post – reporter Jeremy Peters, in a long story, discloses:
Let me further note that Washington Post circulation is substantially down.
Robert Kaiser, senior Post writer and editor who has been with the paper since 1963, told the Times, “When I was managing editor of the Washington Post, everything we did was better than anyone in the business. We had the best weather, the best comics, the best news report, the fullest news report. Today, there’s a competitor who does every element of what we do, and many of them do it better. We’ve lost our edge in some very profound and fundamental ways.”
Peters again:
“Last week, the paper announced a fresh round of voluntary buyouts, an effort to cut 20 more positions as managers reckoned once again with the painful reality that the Post was not making enough money to support the staff it employed.”
The Times did report one positive development: “Recently, it has averaged 19.6 million unique visitors a month, according to comScore, making it the second-most-visited American newspaper website, behind that of the New York Times.”
But are those “unique visitors” the same as subscribers? I really think not – and non-paying visitors don’t pay any of the bills.
Will the Washington Post try charging subscription-like fees to any of those 19 million? And if it does, just how long does the Post believe that online figure would remain at 19 million?
[Read More...]
Name (required)
Email (required)
Website
Notify me of followup comments via e-mail